Font size

Making vegetables more appealing

  •  

2018-01-31

Does labeling carrots as "twisted citrus-glazed carrots" or green beans as "sweet sizzilin' green beans and crispy shallots" make them more enticing and increase vegetable consumption? Healthy positive labeling increases consumption, a study says.

 - Enticing food labeling makes vegetables more appealing, a study says.
© Margot Kessler / pixelio.de
Enticing food labeling makes vegetables more appealing, a study says.

Researcher Bradley P. Turnwald and coauthors from Stanford University in California, tested whether using indulgent descriptive words and phrases typically used to describe less healthy foods would increase vegetable consumption because some perceive healthier foods as less tasty. The study was conducted in a large university cafeteria and data were collected each weekday. Each day, one vegetable was labeled in 1 of 4 ways: basic (e.g., beets, green beans or carrots); healthy restrictive (e.g., “lighter-choice beets with no added sugar,” “light ‘n’ low-carb green beans and shallots” or “carrots with sugar-free citrus dressing”); healthy positive (e.g., “high-antioxidant beets,” “healthy energy-boosting green beans and shallots” or “smart-choice vitamin C citrus carrots”); or indulgent (e.g., “dynamite chili and tangy lime-seasoned beets,” “sweet sizzilin’ green beans and crispy shallots” or “twisted citrus-glazed carrots”).

Although the labeling changed, there were no changes in how the vegetables were prepared or served. Research assistants discretely recorded the number of diners who selected the vegetable and weighed the mass of vegetable taken from the serving bowl. During the study, 8,279 of 27,933 diners selected the vegetable. Indulgent labeling of vegetables resulted in 25 more people selecting the vegetable compared with basic labeling, 41 more people than the healthy restrictive labeling and 35 per cent more people than the healthy positive labeling, according to the results. Indulgent labeling of vegetables also resulted in a 23 per cent increase in the mass of vegetables consumed compared with basic labeling and a 33 per cent increase in the mass of vegetables consumed compared with the healthy restrictive labeling. There was a 16 per cent nonsignificant increase compared with the healthy positive labeling. The authors note they were unable to measure how much food was eaten individually by cafeteria patrons, although people generally eat 92 per cent of self-served food.